Keyword summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video1,176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Disease Ecology results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 935 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (36,762 of 37,536 keywords). This Wildlife Disease Ecology is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
Wildlife Disease Ecology
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,528
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751002.1% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos