Keyword summary
⁠24%5 analyzed articles/videos6,296 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Conservation results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 1,619 hits. Analysis detected 13,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,799 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (35,680 of 37,536 keywords). This Wildlife Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group.
Wildlife Conservation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠5%Wildlife Conservation (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.9% percentile
1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles23.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos