Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,577 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White Supremacists results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,552 hits. Analysis detected 11,765 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,308 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,142 of 37,536 keywords). This White Supremacists is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
White Supremacists
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
20%White Supremacists (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 14,308
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510019.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos