Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These White Mesa Mill results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,099 hits. Analysis detected 7,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This White Mesa Mill is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
White Mesa Mill
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%White Mesa Mill (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,524
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos