Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These White House Government Transparency Taskforce results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 1,308 hits. Analysis detected 5,984 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,981 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 35,444 keywords). This White House Government Transparency Taskforce is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
White House Government Transparency Taskforce
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,981
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 32.9%32.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 32.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos