Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These White House Conduct results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 682 hits . Analysis detected 4,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This White House Conduct is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. White House Conduct
Keyword details
Total words: 3,008
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.7% 22.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst