Keyword summary
74%1 analyzed article/video823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wes Leonard results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 315 hits. Analysis detected 2,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,469 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,681 of 37,536 keywords). This Wes Leonard is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Wes Leonard
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%Wes Leonard (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,469
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos