Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wedding Bookings results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 306 hits. Analysis detected 2,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,273 of 37,536 keywords). This Wedding Bookings is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Wedding Bookings
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
57%Wedding Bookings (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.5%12.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos