Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 491 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Webster University results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anchoring Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 167 hits . Analysis detected 1,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,550 of 37,536 keywords). This Webster University is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Webster University
Keyword details
Total words: 1,964
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst