Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weber County results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 527 hits . Analysis detected 5,857 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,384 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (32,508 of 36,715 keywords). This Weber County is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group. Weber County
Keyword details
Total words: 10,384
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst