Keyword summary
21%1 analyzed article/video1,448 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wealth Divide results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 436 hits. Analysis detected 2,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (24,629 of 36,139 keywords). This Wealth Divide is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Wealth Divide
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
32%Wealth Divide (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,344
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510031.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos