Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Watson V Republican National Committee results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 286 hits. Analysis detected 2,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (29,844 of 37,536 keywords). This Watson V Republican National Committee is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Watson V Republican National Committee
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠21%Watson V Republican National Committee (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,616
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510020.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.9%7.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos