Keyword summary
16%2 analyzed articles/videos1,924 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Water Pollution results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 424 hits. Analysis detected 3,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,696 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (35,661 of 36,718 keywords). This Water Pollution is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group.
Water Pollution
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
3%Water Pollution (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,696
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751002.9% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate