Keyword summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 1,477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Waste Fraud And Abuse results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,011 hits . Analysis detected 6,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 67% (19,108 of 56,417 keywords). This Waste Fraud And Abuse is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Waste Fraud And Abuse
Keyword details
Total words: 5,908
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst