Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,780 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington State Budget results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,049 hits . Analysis detected 9,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,928 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (30,531 of 35,444 keywords). This Washington State Budget is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group. Washington State Budget
Keyword details
Total words: 11,928
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst