Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Square Park results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 44.3% saturation with 539 hits . Analysis detected 2,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,218 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,241 of 37,536 keywords). This Washington Square Park is worse (more manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group. Washington Square Park
Keyword details
Total words: 1,218
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.0% percentile 9.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 27.0% 27.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 44.3% 44.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.2% 27.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 44.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.2%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 27.0%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Red Herring: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.6% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst