Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Nationals results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 987 hits . Analysis detected 4,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,332 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (20,333 of 35,445 keywords). This Washington Nationals is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Washington Nationals
Keyword details
Total words: 4,332
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.8% 22.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst