Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Heights results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Bandwagon, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 246 hits. Analysis detected 1,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,726 of 37,536 keywords). This Washington Heights is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Washington Heights
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
27%Washington Heights (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos