Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wasatch Community Gardens results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 2,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,001 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,919 of 37,536 keywords). This Wasatch Community Gardens is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Wasatch Community Gardens
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,001
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510086.9% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 21.6%21.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 19.4%19.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 26.0%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos