Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Warriors results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 1,262 hits. Analysis detected 5,366 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,816 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,971 of 37,536 keywords). This Warriors is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Warriors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
63%Warriors (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,816
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510062.8% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 11.2%11.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.0%7.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 26.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate