Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These War Goals results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 733 hits. Analysis detected 4,290 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This War Goals is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
War Goals
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%War Goals (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,308
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 22.2%22.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos