Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wallace Stegner results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , In-Group Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 165 hits . Analysis detected 1,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,926 of 37,536 keywords). This Wallace Stegner is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Wallace Stegner
Keyword details
Total words: 600
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.9% percentile 10.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles600 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 26.8% 26.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 27.5% 27.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 19.7% 19.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 27.5%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 26.8%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst