Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Walking Safari results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 780 hits . Analysis detected 4,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,964 of 37,536 keywords). This Walking Safari is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Walking Safari
Keyword details
Total words: 5,568
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst