Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Votingmatters results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 1,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,509 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,957 keywords). This Votingmatters is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Votingmatters
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Votingmatters (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,509
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.7%11.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 26.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos