Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vote Blue No Matter Who results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 1,387 hits . Analysis detected 6,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (8,544 of 37,536 keywords). This Vote Blue No Matter Who is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group. Vote Blue No Matter Who
Keyword details
Total words: 3,896
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.2% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 35.6% 35.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 35.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst