Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vitali Klitschko results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 1,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,439 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,306 of 37,536 keywords). This Vitali Klitschko is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Vitali Klitschko
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
33%Vitali Klitschko (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,439
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510032.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos