Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Vision Zero Coalition results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 902 hits. Analysis detected 2,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,643 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,143 keywords). This Vision Zero Coalition is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Vision Zero Coalition
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Vision Zero Coalition (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,643
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 34.1%34.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.4%6.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 34.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos