Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virginia Supreme Court results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 609 hits. Analysis detected 2,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,180 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (26,473 of 35,921 keywords). This Virginia Supreme Court is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Virginia Supreme Court
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
27%Virginia Supreme Court (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,180
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate