Keyword summary
16% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vintage results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 997 hits . Analysis detected 8,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,250 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (25,349 of 35,665 keywords). This Vintage is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Vintage
Keyword details
Total words: 12,250
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst