Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,179 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Villaraigosa results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 1,736 hits . Analysis detected 6,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,302 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,167 of 37,536 keywords). This Villaraigosa is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group. Villaraigosa
Keyword details
Total words: 6,302
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 27.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst