Keyword summary
ā 0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vikings results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Recency Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 398 hits . Analysis detected 3,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,017 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of ā 96% (1,789 of 37,536 keywords). This Vikings is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group. Vikings
Keyword details
Total words: 1,017
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.2% percentile 10.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 30.2% 30.2% Representativeness Heurisā¦ Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 18.4% 18.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 21.8% 21.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 39.1% 39.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 31.4% 31.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 39.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 31.4%, sitewide 19.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 30.2%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst