Keyword summary
â 52% 1 analyzed article/video 1,146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Viking Warrior results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 363 hits . Analysis detected 2,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,438 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of â 49% (19,447 of 37,536 keywords). This Viking Warrior is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Viking Warrior
Keyword details
Total words: 3,438
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Composition/Division: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst