Keyword summary
8% 1 analyzed article/video 955 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victor Salgado Araujo results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 220 hits . Analysis detected 1,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (29,282 of 37,536 keywords). This Victor Salgado Araujo is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. Victor Salgado Araujo
Keyword details
Total words: 3,820
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst