Keyword summary
86%1 analyzed article/video388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Verona results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 1,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,532 of 34,833 keywords). This Verona is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Verona
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
87%Verona (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510087.0% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 14.3%14.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos