Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Vehicle Pollution results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.5% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 1,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 630 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Vehicle Pollution is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Vehicle Pollution
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Vehicle Pollution (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 630
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles630 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 28.6%28.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 30.5%30.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 31.3%31.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 16.8%16.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 39.5%39.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 12.2%12.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 39.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 31.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.5%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 28.6%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos