Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vegetarian Food And Drink results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 2,077 hits. Analysis detected 12,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (20,843 of 37,536 keywords). This Vegetarian Food And Drink is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Vegetarian Food And Drink
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 12,648
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos