Keyword summary
34% 2 analyzed articles/videos 405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vandenberg Space Force Base results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 436 hits . Analysis detected 2,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,758 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,709 of 37,536 keywords). This Vandenberg Space Force Base is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Vandenberg Space Force Base
Keyword details
Total words: 4,758
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst