Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video489 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Van Allen Belt results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 1,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,815 of 37,536 keywords). This Van Allen Belt is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Van Allen Belt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
58%Van Allen Belt (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,956
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos