Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uw Study results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 283 hits. Analysis detected 1,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,948 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,641 of 37,536 keywords). This Uw Study is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Uw Study
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
37%Uw Study (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,948
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510037.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.6%9.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos