Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Women And Leadership Project results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 925 hits . Analysis detected 7,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (4,052 of 37,536 keywords). This Utah Women And Leadership Project is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Utah Women And Leadership Project
Keyword details
Total words: 3,408
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.2% percentile 6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 21.4% 21.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 18.1% 18.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst