Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Mammoth (formerly Utah Hockey Club) results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 457 hits. Analysis detected 4,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,648 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (21,559 of 37,536 keywords). This Utah Mammoth (formerly Utah Hockey Club) is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Utah Mammoth (formerly Utah Hockey Club)
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,648
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.0%0.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 0.0%0.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos