Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Football results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 67.8% saturation with 810 hits . Analysis detected 3,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,194 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.7% and a BS Rank of 99% (700 of 37,536 keywords). This Utah Football is worse (more manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Utah Football
Keyword details
Total words: 1,194
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.1% percentile 15.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 67.8% 67.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 38.1% 38.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 40.3% 40.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 16.8% 16.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 18.8% 18.8% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 26.1% 26.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Halo Effect: Keyword 67.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 40.3%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 38.1%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 26.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst