Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Elections results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 1,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (24,524 of 34,832 keywords). This Utah Elections is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Utah Elections
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
30%Utah Elections (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,004
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos