Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Elections results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 168 hits . Analysis detected 1,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (24,524 of 34,832 keywords). This Utah Elections is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. Utah Elections
Keyword details
Total words: 3,004
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst