Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video551 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Division Of Wildlife Resources (dwr) results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 2,177 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (15,269 of 37,536 keywords). This Utah Division Of Wildlife Resources (dwr) is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Utah Division Of Wildlife Resources (dwr)
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,204
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos