Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Department Of Agriculture And Food results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 185 hits . Analysis detected 1,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,638 of 37,536 keywords). This Utah Department Of Agriculture And Food is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group. Utah Department Of Agriculture And Food
Keyword details
Total words: 1,300
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.0% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst