Keyword summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Congressional Delegation results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 2,648 hits. Analysis detected 18,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,436 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (32,625 of 37,530 keywords). This Utah Congressional Delegation is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Utah Congressional Delegation
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 22,436
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510013.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles22.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos