Keyword summary
73%1 analyzed article/video544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Water Suppliers results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 1,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 62% (23,141 of 59,653 keywords). This US Water Suppliers is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
US Water Suppliers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
62%US Water Suppliers (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate