Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Troop Withdrawal results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 189 hits . Analysis detected 1,541 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,937 of 37,288 keywords). This Us Troop Withdrawal is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. Us Troop Withdrawal
Keyword details
Total words: 1,848
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.6% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst