Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Men's Team results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 250 hits . Analysis detected 2,091 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (37,081 of 37,288 keywords). This Us Men's Team is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Us Men's Team
Keyword details
Total words: 7,432
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst