Keyword summary
86%1 analyzed article/video533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Israeli Military Integration results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 372 hits. Analysis detected 2,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 83% (8,822 of 49,968 keywords). This US Israeli Military Integration is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
US Israeli Military Integration
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
83%US Israeli Military Integration (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510082.3% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos